We indexed all 34,587 x402 Bazaar resources. 39% come from one host, ~1% return 200.

How we counted

One request/second, limit=200/page, iterated against api.cdp.coinbase.com/platform/v2/x402/discovery/resources until the last page returned fewer than limit items. No authentication, no payment, no state mutation. 173 pages. The endpoint reported pagination.total = 34,587; the fetch pulled item_count = 34,587; truncated = false. Raw bytes were hashed (raw_sha256 in snapshot_meta.json) before any derivation. Per-listing fields were then rolled up into the aggregates summarised below — host concentration, network split, scheme usage, price distribution, recency, field completeness — plus a seeded 100-URL liveness probe (sample_seed=20261005, single GET, 5s timeout). Full method and the inference rules are in the method note.

Update — weekly delta

Weekly update (week of 2026-10-05): the Bazaar now lists 35,007 resources (+420 on this baseline), the top host’s share is 39.46% (+0.48pp), and the Herfindahl–Hirschman index (a standard concentration measure, from 0 to 1) on hosts is 0.160796 (+0.003683). The findings below are the 2026-10-05 baseline reading and are unchanged. Weekly updates are on the dataset page.

Finding 1 — One host holds 38.98% of the entire index.

market.datapackvibe.com accounts for 13,481 of the 34,587 listings — 38.98% on its own. The top ten hosts together hold 57.91%. Herfindahl–Hirschman on listings per host is 0.1571 — concentrated but not single-vendor. 2,122 distinct hosts in total.

The practical read: a lot of what looks like “a 34,587-row bazaar” is one publisher’s catalog, and a lot of the rest is a long thin tail. If you are evaluating a listing, the host is an important field — not the row count.

Finding 2 — A 100-URL seeded probe returned 1% HTTP 200, 40% HTTP 402, 47% HTTP 405, 7% net error.

We drew a seeded random sample of 100 resource URLs (seed 20261005), issued a single HTTP GET at each with a 5-second timeout, and recorded the status. The breakdown:

This is a lower-bound liveness measurement. It does not say any particular listing delivers what it advertises after payment — a 402 is a challenge, not a receipt. But the three populations the probe can separate (answers with a challenge / answers but not on GET / doesn’t answer at all) are already very different cohorts, and only 1 in 100 returned a 2xx on an unauthenticated GET.

Finding 3 — The median listed price is $0.01. 83.55% price at or below one cent.

Of the 34,587 listings, 34,490 carry an inferable USD price; the remaining 97 either denominate in a non-USD-pegged asset or omit a decimals field. Across the priced subset:

• Median: $0.01.
• P90: $0.03, P99: $0.945001, max: $1,000.
• 83.55% price at ≤ $0.01 — 28,817 of 34,490 priced listings.
• 96.55% price at ≤ $0.10.
• 99.32% price at ≤ $1.00.

The modal x402 unit is a microtransaction. SaaS-seat pricing is a rounding error in this catalog, and the single max value of $1,000 is almost certainly a one-shot workload or a mis-flagged batch unit, not a $1,000-per-call list price.

Finding 4 — 99.47% of listings accept at least one mainnet; Base dominates.

99.47% of the 34,587 listings carry at least one mainnet in their accepts[] array; 93.14% are mainnet-only (no testnet accepts entry at all). The modal payment network, by a wide margin, is Base mainnet (CAIP-2 eip155:8453) with 35,534 of 59,803 accepts[] entries. Solana mainnet is second (7,359), then Polygon mainnet (3,313), Arbitrum One (2,527), Base Sepolia (2,362), and Optimism mainnet (1,178). The index spans 47 distinct CAIP-2 network identifiers in total — including XRPL, Stellar pubnet, Algorand mainnet, and multiple less-common EVM chains.

Finding 5 — Only 32 of 34,587 listings are MCP-type (0.09%).

The resource-type split is 34,555 http and 32 mcp. MCP-type listings are 0.093% of the index — negligible. The Bazaar is overwhelmingly a catalogue of ordinary HTTP endpoints called directly over x402; it is not yet a distribution channel for MCP servers.

Finding 6 — The index is young. 58.4% of listings were updated in the last 7 days.

58.4% of listings carry a lastUpdated within 7 days of the fetch window, 16.93% within 24 hours, and only 0.05% older than 90 days. The catalog is being actively refreshed, which is consistent with the host-concentration finding above — the top publisher almost certainly batch-rolls its catalog on a short cadence. Field completeness is high on descriptive fields (description_present_pct = 99.82, tags_present_pct = 80.74) and middling on identity-bearing fields (service_name_present_pct = 44.4).

What this means for an agent choosing x402 services

Listing is not liveness. 34,587 rows exist in the Bazaar; a seeded random probe at those rows returned a 2xx on 1 in 100 and a correct x402 payment challenge on 40 in 100. Half of the probed listings never got to the 402 handshake on a GET at all. A buyer-side agent evaluating these services has to answer three separate questions — is it advertised, does it answer, does it deliver after payment — and the Bazaar listing itself only addresses the first.

Listing is not identity. The host field is a URL, not a counterparty. 38.98% of the index resolves to a single host; another ~19% resolves to the next nine. Walking a listing to a registry-owned identity (the ERC-8004 publisher that owns the pay_to) is a separate layer, and the overlap between “listed in the Bazaar” and “registered as an ERC-8004 agent” is a cross-dataset join — see the companion ERC-8004 four-chain census for the on-chain population.

The gap between the three layers is the verification work.

Disclosure: Onchain Agent Intel’s own endpoints are not listed in this snapshot.

Reproducing this report

Every number above can be re-checked from the dataset files on the dataset page: the summary, the per-listing CSV (34,587 rows), the liveness-probe trace, and a checksum file. Everything is CC BY 4.0.